Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3407.
Google Scholar
Endalamaw A, Zewdie A, Wolka E, Assefa Y. A scoping review of digital health technologies in Multimorbidity management: mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and strategies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):382.
Google Scholar
Baumgarten M, Brødsgaard A, Nørholm V, Foss NB, Bunkenborg G. Interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians in the perioperative period. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2023;38(5):724–31.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for safe surgery 2009: safe surgery saves lives. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2009. pp. 1–10.
Michard F, Saugel B. New sensors for the early detection of clinical deterioration on general wards and beyond – a clinician’s perspective. J Clin Monit Comput. 2025;39(2):435–42.
Google Scholar
Deol ES, et al. Artificial intelligence model for automated surgical instrument detection and counting: an experimental proof-of-concept study. Patient Saf Surg. 2024;18:24.
Google Scholar
Amir AS, Mulyana D, Dida S, Suminar JR, editors. Enhancing Doctor-Patient Communication through Digital Media Platforms: A Study on Innovation in Health Interaction. Proceeding of The International Conference of Inovation, Science, Technology, Education, Children, and Health; 2024.
Joshi M, Ashrafian H, Arora S, Sharabiani M, McAndrew K, Khan SN, et al. A pilot study to investigate real-time digital alerting from wearable sensors in surgical patients. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022;8(1):140.
Google Scholar
Kenig N, Monton Echeverria J, Muntaner Vives A. Artificial intelligence in surgery: A systematic review of use and validation. J Clin Med. 2024;13:23.
Google Scholar
Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70–6.
Google Scholar
Ke YH et al. Real-world deployment and evaluation of PEri-operative AI chatbot (PEACH): a large Language model chatbot for peri-operative medicine. Anaesth 2025 Sep 19 (Online ahead of print).
Stam WT, Goedknegt LK, Ingwersen EW, Schoonmade LJ, Bruns ER, Daams F. The prediction of surgical complications using artificial intelligence in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2022;171(4):1014–21.
Google Scholar
Arjmandnia F, et al. The value of machine learning technology and artificial intelligence to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2024;18:11.
Google Scholar
Khalifa M, Albadawy M, Iqbal U. Advancing clinical decision support: the role of artificial intelligence across six domains. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update. 2024;5:100142.
Google Scholar
Colborn K, Brat G, Callcut R. Predictive analytics and artificial intelligence in Surgery-Opportunities and risks. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(4):337–8.
Google Scholar
Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17:1–9.
Google Scholar
Akter MS, Sultana N, Khan MAR, Mohiuddin M. Business intelligence-driven healthcare: integrating big data and machine learning for strategic cost reduction and quality care delivery. Am J Interdisciplinary Stud. 2023;4(02):01–28.
Cloß K, Verket M, Müller-Wieland D, et al. Application of wearables for remote monitoring of oncology patients: a scoping review. Digit HEALTH. 2024;10.
Amin T, Mobbs RJ, Mostafa N, Sy LW, Choy WJ. Wearable devices for patient monitoring in the early postoperative period: a literature review. Mhealth. 2021;7:50.
Google Scholar
Breteler MJ, KleinJan EJ, Dohmen DA, Leenen LP, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP, et al. Vital signs monitoring with wearable sensors in high-risk surgical patients: a clinical validation study. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(3):424–39.
Google Scholar
Breteler MJ, Huizinga E, van Loon K, Leenen LP, Dohmen DA, Kalkman CJ, et al. Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the netherlands: a clinical validation study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e020162.
Google Scholar
Feng Z, Bhat RR, Yuan X, Freeman D, Baslanti T, Bihorac A, et al. editors. Intelligent perioperative system: towards real-time big data analytics in surgery risk assessment. 2017 IEEE 15th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 15th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 3rd Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech); 2017: IEEE.
Hedrick TL, Hassinger TE, Myers E, Krebs ED, Chu D, Charles AN, et al. Wearable technology in the perioperative period: predicting risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(4):538–44.
Google Scholar
Kolovos P. Wearable technologies in post-operative recovery: clinical applications and positive impacts. Int J Caring Sci. 2020;13(2):1474.
Kulp L, Sarcevic A, Cheng M, Zheng Y, Burd RS, editors. Comparing the effects of paper and digital checklists on team performance in time-critical work. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2019.
Pati AB, Mishra TS, Chappity P, Venkateshan M, Pillai JS. Use of technology to improve the adherence to surgical safety checklists in the operating room. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;49(10):572–6.
Greig P, Zolger D, Onwochei D, Thurley N, Higham H, Desai N. Cognitive aids in the management of clinical emergencies: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(3):343–55.
Google Scholar
Daly Guris RJ, Lane-Fall MB. Checklists and cognitive aids: underutilized and under-researched tools to promote patient safety and optimize clinician performance. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2022;35(6):723–7.
Google Scholar
Hu Y, Strong VE. Robotic surgery and oncologic outcomes. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1537–9.
Google Scholar
Douissard J, Hagen ME, Morel P. The da Vinci surgical system. Bariatric robotic surgery: a comprehensive guide. 2019:13–27.
Wah JNK. Revolutionizing surgery: AI and robotics for precision, risk reduction, and innovation. J Robotic Surg. 2025;19(1):1–15.
Google Scholar
Liu Z, Huang J, Zhang H, Zhang S, Dai H, Jiang Y, et al. The application of robotic and artificial intelligence technologies in spinal surgery: a review focused on prospects in remote areas of China. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):594.
Google Scholar
SHAFIK W. Remote Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Procedures: Technologies, Benefits and Limitations, Applications, Regulatory Framework, and Future Trends. Revolutionary Impact of 5G on Advancement of Technology in Healthcare. 2025:23.
Picozzi P, Nocco U, Puleo G, Labate C, Cimolin V. Telemedicine and robotic surgery: a narrative review to analyze advantages, limitations and future developments. Electronics. 2023;13(1):124.
Google Scholar
Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y, et al. The ‘Digital twin’to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(48):4556–64.
Google Scholar
Li N, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in transfusion practice: an analytical assessment. Transfus Med Rev. 2025;39(4):150926.
Google Scholar
Erol T, Mendi AF, Doğan D, editors. The digital twin revolution in healthcare. 2020 4th international symposium on multidisciplinary studies and innovative technologies (ISMSIT); 2020: IEEE.
Bruynseels K, Van den Santoni de Sio F. Digital twins in health care: ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm. Front Genet. 2018;9:31.
Google Scholar
Ghaednia H, Fourman MS, Lans A, Detels K, Dijkstra H, Lloyd S, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials. Spine J. 2021;21(10):1617–25.
Google Scholar
Furman AA, Hsu WK. Augmented reality (AR) in orthopedics: current applications and future directions. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021:1–9.
Ayoub A, Pulijala Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in oral & maxillofacial surgery. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:1–8.
Google Scholar
Suresh D, Aydin A, James S, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P. The role of augmented reality in surgical training: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2023;30(3):366–82.
Google Scholar
Dargan S, Bansal S, Kumar M, Mittal A, Kumar K. Augmented reality: A comprehensive review. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2023;30(2):1057–80.
Google Scholar
Munzer BW, Khan MM, Shipman B, Mahajan P. Augmented reality in emergency medicine: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e12368.
Google Scholar
link